Comparison

Aurict vs OpenCode

Both are open-source terminal coding agents with provider and permission configuration. Aurict focuses on a curated built-in provider catalog, bounded Project Auto, completion evidence, and a broader local verification toolchain.

Curated runtime controls and proof-oriented delivery

Documented workflows

AreaAurictOpenCode
Provider approach12 built-in adapters75+ provider ecosystem and custom configuration
Edit permissionsProject Auto for bounded typed file changesPer-tool allow, deny, or ask configuration
Code intelligenceSemantic search, dependency docs, and workspace visionBuilt-in tools and documented LSP operations
Completion evidenceDurable /proof recordReview OpenCode's current workflow documentation

Where Aurict differs

12 built-in provider adapters
Bounded Project Auto for safe typed file changes
Durable completion proof and verification evidence
Semantic search, dependency docs, vision, browser, and eval tools

Research note

Competitor information was reviewed against official documentation on 2026-07-22. Products change quickly; verify the sources below before making a decision.

OpenCode providersOpenCode tools and permissions

Other comparisons

Aurict vs Claude CodeAurict vs CursorAurict vs AiderAurict vs GitHub Copilot